Ludwigshafen

Special Edition BASF information

BASF information is the newspaper for BASF employees at the Ludwigshafen site. After the accident at the North Harbor on October 17, 2016, a special edition was published, which was also published on the Internet. The online version of this special edition was updated at regular intervals.

Dear Colleagues,

A tragic accident occurred at our site in Ludwigshafen on October 17. Two BASF firefighters and a barge crewman from an external company were killed; many other colleagues were injured. We are still deeply shocked and saddened by the fact that such an accident could happen.
Over the past few days, we have dedicated all our efforts to stabilizing the situation. I continue to face thoughts and feelings that I am sure many of you share: Deep sorrow and mourning for those who lost their lives. Heartfelt sympathy and condolences for their families and relatives. Wishes for a speedy recovery to all those injured in the accident, and hope and compassion that we send out to their families.
We feel tremendous gratitude for the emergency personnel and responders who risked their lives to protect and rescue. We are also very thankful for the solidarity and support we have received from customers, businesses, municipal politicians and partners. Our deep appreciation also goes to the crisis response team, which has worked around the clock to analyze and assess developments and make the right decisions with prudence and professionalism – coordinated with the appropriate authorities and municipalities. On behalf of all my fellow Executive Board Members, I thank all of you for your support. The accident raises many questions, and we still do not have answers to all of them. How could this happen? Did we make any mistakes? What do we learn from this? I understand when you ask: Why is everything taking so long? This is more than dissatisfying – for all of us; it truly puts our patience to the test. But we must proceed with caution and due care. It is vital that we stick to the facts and avoid speculation. We will not make premature statements before we have absolute certainty.
I assure you that we are working tirelessly and with great dedication to find out exactly what happened. We owe this to the grieving families, relatives, comrades and friends, the public and ourselves. I can also assure you that we will immediately inform you of any new findings, and that we will learn from this accident. Our neighbors are also posing questions to us; they have expectations, worries and concerns, and they expect answers. They trust that we will do the right thing. We must prove this on a daily basis in order to regain and strengthen that trust. This also requires that we continue to conduct thorough and honest analyses. One thing I can emphasize with absolute certainty: Safety is always the top priority at BASF. We all live by it. Every day. What is also clear after such an accident is that our safety measures are put to the test time and again – and we will continue to invest in safety. I am personally committed to this. Criticism has been voiced regarding some of our communication. Social media reactions and other reports inevitably begin to speculate while we are still working to obtain an overview of the situation, combat the damage and gather facts. This might give the impression that we are a step behind.
This point has also been raised in the feedback we received from you, dear colleagues, and it is a matter that we are certainly taking to heart. We are faced with the challenge of normalizing our daily operations. But the mourning and compassion will accompany us over the coming weeks and months. My thoughts are with those who perished, the injured, their families and their relatives.

Yours,

Kurt Bock

Chairman of the Board of Executive Directors of BASF SE

“Don’t Suppress the Grief”

An explosion on Monday of last week claimed the lives of members of the BASF site fire department; several fellow firefighters were severely injured. Their colleagues now have to deal with this difficult situation, while mastering their daily routines at the same time; even at the site of the accident. BASF information spoke to the Head of the Fire Department at BASF, Rolf Haselhorst (GUS/F), about the situation, and what lies ahead for his team and himself.

Mr. Haselhorst, how are your colleagues and you personally dealing with what has happened?
Of course, every person deals with the situation differently. But you have to look at us as one big family. The colleagues spend 24 hours with one another during their shifts; even on Christmas and Easter. Some of them have spent much of their professional and personal lives together. This is a severe loss. And it helps that we spend a lot of time discussing our thoughts and feelings with one another. I am here at 6:30 am every morning and I talk to all colleagues. I thank them that they are here; that they are holding up. I tell them that they should not suppress their grief, but rather accept it.

How is BASF currently supporting the site fire department?
We take extensive advantage of the psychological counseling provided by the human resources department and the medical department. These colleagues are on-site at the two firehouses every day. Many BASF managers came by this Monday to express their condolences. Dr. Kurt Bock spoke with the firefighters and visited the scene of the accident.

My team members also greatly appreciated that Margret Suckale, our Human Resources Leader, directed words of remembrance and consolation to those assembled in front of the Gesellschaftshaus during a moment of silence. Following this, many BASF employees approached the colleagues, shook their hands and thanked them for their excellent work. These are very important and emotional moments.

In fact, many colleagues voluntarily interrupted their holidays to return to the site in order to ensure its safety. We have received offers of assistance from fire departments at other BASF sites and from neighboring fire departments. Colleagues from other sites will be supporting us here in Ludwigshafen. This team spirit does wonders for us.

How are you commemorating the colleagues who lost their lives?
All firefighters on the shift attended the moment of silence together and mourned their colleagues. We will be organizing our own event for all rescue personnel from BASF to deal with our grief together, and we will take part in the memorial services held in the hometowns of those who died. All emergency vehicles at BASF fire departments around the world are donning crapes.

We are also in contact with the families of those injured, who also need our assistance.

Will anything change for future assignments?
We are optimally prepared for our assignments. We practice every day in the plants. Our firefighters have completed supplementary training programs. Of course, everyone is particularly sensitized at the moment. We must first wait for the cause analysis. And I do want to add that I am particularly proud of my team. The team members continued on with their assignment and ensured the safety of all BASF employees with the same level of excellence, even under these very difficult circumstances, in the days that followed the accident.

“Many people do not know that something like an Emergency Response Steering Committee even exists, much less what it does and who participates in it. External media coverage suggests that the company's top management barely showed their presence after the accident and that information was only passed on after being put under pressure. Here, people forget that speculation helps nobody and verified and confirmed information must have priority.”

Heike Bernhard (ESE/PS)

Diagram of the North Harbor and pipeline's trench with the accident site. Graphic: BASF

11:30 am

The LAG is still convening when an explosion and several consecutive fires occur during works carried out on a pipeline in the North Harbour at the Ludwigshafen site. Emergency personnel from the site's fire department, professional fire departments from Ludwigshafen and Mannheim and additional rescue personnel and police arrive at the scene of the accident. The respective authorities are informed. At this time, officials suspect that there are several injured persons. A public hotline is established immediately following the tragic accident.

4:00 pm

BASF and the City of Ludwigshafen hold a press conference. According to current information available one employee was killed. Six people are severely injured, others are slightly injured. Six people are still missing. Logistics employees and truck drivers are evacuated at Gate 15 and this gate and the intermodal transport terminal is shut down. At this point, it is assumed that pipelines containing ethylene and propylene are on fire.

9:00 am

The outer perimeter surrounding the site of the accident is cleared for investigations by the public prosecutor's office and the police.

11:00 am

At this time it is clear: Two person have been killed, eight people are severely injured and 17 people are slightly injured. One person is still missing.

12:00 pm

BASF and the City of Ludwigshafen conduct a second press conference. Kurt Bock addresses BASF employees in a personal letter.

3:30 pm

A site for peace and contemplation is set up on the forecourt of the Gesellschaftshaus where employees and citizens can express their compassion.

12:00 pm

Employees of BASF commemorate the victims in a moment of silence.

12:30 pm

Divers from the police and professional fire departments from Ludwigshafen and Mannheim recover the body of an unidentified person from the port basin of the North Harbour.

1:00 pm

All cultural events up to October 23 are canceled.

7:00 pm

An announcement is issued that the steam crackers will gradually resume operations over the coming days. A total of 24 plants remain fully shut down at this time. The fire also damaged pipelines for raw materials procured from third parties. BASF has therefore issued force majeure declarations for the acceptance, among other things, of naphtha and propylene.

8:30 am

Lampertheim: Two injured persons could be released from hospital on the day of the deflagration; the two other injured persons are still undergoing inpatient treatment.

4:20 pm

Kurt Bock, the Chairman of the Board of Executive Directors, speaks to the employees about the events on October 17 in a personal video message.

4:55 pm

Police and public prosecutor's office confirm that the body recovered from the North Harbour two days earlier is the barge crewman who was still unaccounted for.

7:30 pm

BASF publishes the results of its own air measurements after the fire on the North Harbor. The results do not show up anything unusual. The City of Ludwigshafen and the Ministry of the Environment of the Rhineland-Palatinate attest to the results. Locally increased values were only determined near the accident site.

11:30 am

Dr. Eva Lohse, Mayor of the City of Ludwigshafen, together with other political representatives meet with the Chairman of the Board of Executive Directors Dr. Kurt Bock as well as the Member of the Board and Site Manager Margret Suckale to talk over the events of October 17. Bock assures the authorities of his full assistance in determining the facts.

BASF experts begin the process of flushing out the decommissioned pipelines in the North Harbor, securing them and then separating them from the site network. They coordinate with the public prosecutor’s office and the Southern Structure and Licensing Directorate (Struktur- und Genehmigungsdirektion Süd).

9:00 am

A special meeting is held by the Landtag (State Parliament) of Rhineland-Palatinate. In addition to the grief, the consequences on the environment, business, safety and residents are the main topics. Site Director Dr. Uwe Liebelt as well as an expert team consisting of members of the Emergency Response Steering Committee (LAG) represent BASF on-site.

A BASF site firefighter, who was severely injured in the explosion, dies of his injuries in hospital. The death toll rises to four.

The intermodal transport terminal resumes operations.

5:30 am

Gate 15, which has been closed since the accident due to safety measures at the damage site, is re-opened.

12:00 pm

Employees of BASF commemorate a moment of silence for the death of the fellow firefighter on October 29 and all those who lost their lives or were injured.

Since the early hours of the morning, the second steam cracker at the North Harbor location is running again.

The Frankenthal public prosecutor’s office releases parts of the North Harbor. The release of the pipeline’s trench can only be performed after the forensic investigations are completed. There are still safety and flushing measures at the pipeline trench by BASF employees, in close coordination with the regulatory and investigation authorities. The North Harbor remains shut down.

3:00 pm

A special meeting is held in the City Council of Ludwigshafen. The Head of the Professional Fire Department of Ludwigshafen, Peter Friedrich, and the Head of the Fire Department at BASF, Rolf Haselhorst, declare the operational procedure. Site Director Dr. Uwe Liebelt as well as an expert team answer the questions of the City Council.

3:30 pm

BASF commissions, according to specifications from the Southern Structure and Licensing Directorate, an independent expert to analyze the accident that occurred at the North Harbor. The aim of the expert’s report is to analyze the sequence of events and cause of the accident. Furthermore, experts from the state criminal police are looking into the circumstances of the accident.

9:00 am

An internal memorial for the third firefighter who lost his life takes place at the Feierabendhaus with his family.

Overview of the Site

Employees and citizens can express their sympathies in the book of condolences at the Gesellschaftshaus. Photo: BASF

BASF offers all employees and citizens the opportunity to express condolences and sympathy. As a charitable organization, the BASF Stiftung has set up a fund that will provide financial support to the victims and families in their time of need.

BASF has set up a place of peace and contemplation in front of the Gesellschaftshaus (Casino) on Anilinstraße, Ludwigshafen. A book of condolences is on display there, where everyone can express their sympathies at least until the end of this week. Moreover, there is the option of sending a condolence message via email to global.info@basf.com or as a personal letter to BASF SE, Carl-Bosch-Straße 38, 67056 Ludwigshafen, Germany. As a charitable organization, the BASF Stiftung has set up a fund that will provide financial support to the victims and families in their time of need. It also gives BASF employees the option of expressing their condolences to the victims and their families with a donation. Donations can be made to the BASF Stiftung using the keyword “Wir helfen” (We help). The donations are paid in full to the people affected and their family members.

The bank details are:
Commerzbank Ludwigshafen
IBAN: DE71 5454 0033 02061729 00
BIC: COBADEFFXXX.

“Pain Comes After The Shock”

Olga Zumstein (GUA/AP) is a psychiatrist and psychotherapist as well as an emergency physician. On the day of the accident, the 47-year-old was on site, and she and her colleagues from the employee support working group took care of the psychological needs of employees and relatives of the victims. BASF information talked to her about her experiences and the special challenges after the events of October 17.

After an event like this, the thoughts, fears, images or smells are very real and often depressing for some. Photo: dpa

How did you handle the last few days?
I am a doctor and am confronted with injuries and death time and again. But despite that, I have never experienced such an extreme case. I was deeply impressed by the firefighters and by how they looked out for each other while doing their work, how they had each other's backs and paid attention to how the others were doing. They saw how their colleagues were injured or even died and still went back to fighting the fire after short breaks. That is an enormous emotional challenge, and dealing with something like this takes time. And after the initial shock wears off, that is when this incredible pain begins to bloom, the pain of loss. For this reason, I told the fire fighters: You are strong people, but this is not the time to feel ashamed or have false pride. Be like everybody else, be open and let us help you.

Are you only counseling the firefighters?
No. Our psychological counseling is open for everybody: for all employees, all family members of victims and for the employees of contractors. We visit the colleagues in the fire department and at the harbors every day, but we have also been with the families of the victims, with those in the hospital with severe injuries and wherever else our help is needed.

How do you help those who were affected by the accident?
We especially try to not be intrusive, to provide information and make observations. Anxieties and sorrow after such an incident are a normal human reaction. Everybody deals with traumatic experiences differently: One person may internalize them where another will feel the need to talk to someone. This is why there are different approaches to helping people: For some, it may be enough to silently keep them company and maintain eye contact and start a conversation later, whereas others prefer to talk to someone immediately. Here, I feel it is important to understand the fears and worries of the people affected to offer them the help they need. An important part of processing such events is sleeping well, but that is also what is most difficult for many people. For this reason, I suggest breathing exercises, mindfulness exercises and sometimes even sleeping pills. Some people also need the support of specific practices.

How can they be supported even more?
After an event like this, the thoughts, fears, images or smells are very real and often depressing for some. For example, some of the people I am counseling are not able to drink coffee or eat meat since this brings back their memories of the incident. Together, we come up with the smells they associate with positive experiences, to use these fragrances in a targeted way to let them forget the unpleasant smell of the fire.

Human biomonitoring

Apart from emergency care, treatment of injured people and counseling, GUA is also conducting human biomonitoring for those who were at the scene of the accident. This has long been routine for emergency personnel. It includes measuring hazardous substances in urine in order to recognize and evaluate exposure to them. Human biomonitoring has been a well-established tool in occupational and environmental medicine for years and is the standard procedure after every emergency. The approximately 80 samples provided up to now are being analyzed by our experts. The first results will be available at the beginning of November.

What can employees do when they notice that a colleague is doing badly?
The most important thing is to address that person, do not be shy about it. Do not act like a doctor and try to diagnose your colleague, but talk to them. Some say, “I don't want to talk, leave me alone!” In this case, show them that you are there for them and give them the time they need to open up to you.

You were there on the day of the accident yourself and have constantly been counseling those who were affected since then. How are you dealing with what you experienced?
I try to sleep enough, to sleep through the night. I concentrate on one task, avoid multitasking and treat myself carefully. But first of all, it helps me that people come to me with worries and leave with hope. That is a happy moment for me.

BASF doctors and regional emergency doctors already practiced collaborating often. Practice turned into reality on October 17. Photo: BASF

Doctors in Action

When Dr. Kurt Bauder (GUA/DN) received a call at the beginning of lunch on October 17, it was immediately clear that it involved a major incident.
After sounding the internal company alarm, the head emergency physician immediately traveled in an ambulance to the accident site, accompanied by two other doctors. Once there, the physicians were met by the fire department and three BASF paramedics who had already brought some of the injured to a place accessible to rescue personnel.

“All of them had very visible burn injuries, some of them very serious,” reported Bauder. Additional emergency doctors and ambulances were requested through the command center, both from BASF and externally, who gradually arrived on the scene. At the same time, emergency medical procedures were being administered: The wounded were being treated and priorities for transportation off site were being established, based on the severity of injury. A strict division of work between team members prevented any loss of time. A dressing station was set up and stocked with adequate supplies. External personnel helped with transporting the victims. On site, the wounded were first administered venous catheters. They were given painkillers and supplied with special blankets to keep warm. Bauder explained that “body cooling is a great danger.” The benefits of the stable network between BASF occupational medicine and emergency physicians in the area, developed through training courses and drills, now demonstrated its value. “We all know each other well, which really facilitated cooperation in this situation.” The burn victims were taken to the BG trauma center in Ludwigshafen, which is specialized in burn injuries, and immediately increased its capacity to handle a maximum number of injured. Some patients were also taken to the University Hospital in Mannheim. Afterwards, Bauder and other rescue personnel stayed on site in case more missing persons were found, and also as backup for the fire brigade. “During our work on site, I was not thinking about how I felt. I had no time for that,” said Bauder. “As things calmed down, I started thinking more: How are the patients doing? Were our own people in danger?” As an emergency physician, the 48-year-old had already handled many difficult assignments before joining BASF in 2010, even as an emergency helicopter doctor. However, the explosion in North Harbor was the biggest challenge he has faced to date. On a positive note, he said that “our emergency medical service did an excellent job. Some colleagues even interrupted their holidays and came to the site to help out.” Bauder is still concerned about the fate of the victims days after the incident. Together with Dr. Tobias Conzelmann (GUA/AS), he visited the severely injured in the BG emergency clinic, conveying best wishes from their colleagues and then reporting to rescue personnel about how the injured are faring and whether they can receive visitors.

Emotional Support for Relatives

Many people have been affected by the accident, such as those helping with the rescue on site. They are enduring an enormous psychological burden, even though it is different from what relatives and family members are experiencing. It is important that no one be left alone. Psychological support for employees and their relatives can help them process what they have experienced.

The employee support working group was created over twenty years ago at the Ludwigshafen site to be on call whenever emotional support was needed. The group includes experts from the Occupational Medicine and Safety department (GUA), social counseling service (BASF Foundation) and other employees from the Human Resources competence center (GP) as well as members of the works council. They have all been specially trained in this capacity. The working group has been tasked to support and help employees who have been affected by damage events, even though they remain physically unharmed. Moreover, the team stays in contact with relatives of injured or deceased colleagues, which they maintain as long and actively as is necessary.

The Persons Affected Set Their Personal Boundaries
The experts were also immediately involved in the accident on October 17. They assisted rescue helpers and employees at the accident site, spoke with relatives or assisted emergency personnel from both fire stations. They were also tasked with informing the families of those killed in the accident of the sad news. “Our goal is to notify the families first and as quickly as possible. However, sometimes that is difficult, as it was in this case. Unfortunately, because of the large-scale fire that continued to rage after dark, it took some time to uncover and identify the deceased at the site of the accident,” said Wolfgang Klump (GPT/DO), coordinator of the working group. “We also look after the relatives of the injured. We accompanied them to the hospitals and informed them of the next steps. All in all, we are simply there if someone needs to talk – the affected persons set their own personal boundaries.” As part of the crisis management team, members of the working group also answered calls on the family telephone hot line on Monday and Tuesday.

Counseling and Information

BASF has offered various counseling and consultation services since October 17 in order to inform and support relatives, employees and neighboring residents.

Employee and Public Hotlines: An employee and public hotline was established after the tragic accident. Ten colleagues took more than 1,400 calls in shifts until the late afternoon of October 19. The callers mostly asked how to conduct themselves properly. Ever since calls have stopped coming in, BASF provides information on the current state of affairs via recorded message. Anyone who wants to speak to a contact directly can get in touch with the Environmental Monitoring Center at any time by calling 0621/60 40 40.

Family Hotline: The family hotline was active on Monday and Tuesday. Employees with special psychological training took calls, held an initial counseling discussion and offered further support as needed.

Service for Affected Employees: Everyone who still wants to talk about the event can confidentially and personally contact the experts at the Occupational Medicine and Safety department (GUA) and social counseling service (BASF Foundation). The contacts are Olga Zumstein (0621 60-79922) and Dr. Kristin Hupfer (0621 60-42960). The social counseling service (0621 60-45593) can be reached from 8 am to 4:30 pm, Monday to Friday. Affected persons can talk to a site doctor at any time by calling 0621 60-46666 (the clinic).

What Happens in a Crisis?

Here you can obtain answers to frequently asked questions on the crisis communication concerning the major fire.

What procedures are to be followed during a crisis?
There is a clearly defined information chain in case of emergency. If a case of damage occurs, all affected units at the site are informed via a centrally controlled alarm system. Every alarm, even if it turns out to be a false alarm, is taken seriously: A fire brigade, generally comprised of four vehicles, proceeds to the scene with flashing blue lights. In addition, ambulances, environmental monitoring vehicles and site security rush to the scene of the accident. The objective is, for example, to extinguish a fire as quickly and comprehensively as possible. Equally important is to obtain established facts on possible hazards within and outside the site as soon as possible. We immediately inform the respective authorities, specifically the police and fire departments of the cities of Ludwigshafen, Mannheim and Frankenthal as well as the Southern Structure and Licensing Directorate (Struktur- und Genehmigungsdirektion Süd) – as the superordinate state authority of Rhineland-Palatinate. In case of particularly critical situations, the Emergency Response Steering Committee (LAG), the crisis team at BASF, meets at the same time. LAG makes all key decisions – including those concerning crisis communication – in close collaboration with rescue personnel, authorities and government. The corporate communications department is then responsible for informing employees, neighbors and the public. This is done internally, for example, via a message in Online Reporter, an issue of “BASF aktuell” which is available at the gates, or via the “BASF today” ticker which is also shown on various monitors throughout the site. In parallel, a press release is distributed and is intended to serve the media as a basis for their reporting.

How was it possible that external media was able to report on the major fire far quicker than we were?
The top priority is informing the public within and outside the site’s boundaries actively and in a timely manner. The aim is to do this within one hour. But the facts have to be right – and it is unfortunately not always possible to verify them immediately. If emergency services are still ongoing, and the focus is on saving lives, it can take time to clarify all the details. And special care must be taken when, as in this case, injuries and casualties are involved. And the information chain must also be taken into account. Here, once again, the subsequent communication is triggered by the notification sent to the authorities. When a major event such as this one occurs, journalists rush to the scene of the accident and sometimes begin their reporting before established and confirmed facts are available. And of course, there are many private citizens who post photos, videos and their personal observations on social media immediately after the event occurred. And we cannot and will not be part of such activities. But we do take advantage of our channels such as Facebook or Twitter to communicate with our neighbors. In addition, employees and citizens can inform themselves via special public hotlines.

Why has there not been any reporting on the causes of the accident?
Because we cannot issue any statements concerning the causes. BASF works closely with the responsible authorities to determine the causes of the accident. The Frankenthal public prosecutor’s office and the criminal investigation department have begun their investigation. An external expert will be commissioned upon order by the public prosecutor’s office.

Photo: BASF

Outside the Site, the City is Responsible

The BASF main site is closely connected to the City of Ludwigshafen and the entire metropolitan Rhine-Neckar area. Many residents live in the direct vicinity of BASF and pass through the site's gates as employees every day.

BASF works closely with the cities, fire departments and civil protection – both in cases of emergency and when it comes to informing the population. However, there are different responsibilities on and off the site, including when it comes to suggesting preventive safety measures.

The City is Responsible for Providing Information Off-Site
“Since the tragedy last week, we have received many concerned questions from residents as well as the employees. Many of them were unsettled because they, as both employees and residents, had varying information and were unsure on how to act,” said Anke Schmidt, Head of Communications (ZOA). “On site, BASF provides information on events and potential hazardous situations to its employees via loudspeakers and copies of ‘BASF aktuell’ at the gates as well as via email and on the Intranet. Off-site, however, the city is responsible for providing information. We are in close communication with external authorities, but they make their own decisions on which safety measures they recommend to the public.”

Shortly after the explosion, the residents of the neighboring districts of Ludwigshafen and Mannheim were preventively asked to avoid being outdoors for longer periods of time and keep doors and windows closed via the KATWARN warning system. Employees on site were also informed of what had happened. However, aside from the area surrounding the site of the accident, no preventive measures were called for and the change of shifts took place as usual.

“Immediately after the accident, our environmental monitoring vehicles went out and measured the air and the samples taken from precipitation on ground level and from surfaces on-site and in the surrounding areas.” Higher values of hazardous substances were only measured in the area surrounding the site of the accident. This is why there was no reason to warn employees outside this immediate area from opening windows. Odors could still be perceived in a wider area surrounding the site as there are substances of which low concentrations can already have a perceivable odor without being harmful. Of course, we also immediately made these measured values available to the City of Ludwigshafen,” said Michael Heintz (ESE/MU) of the Environmental Monitoring Center.

Safety Measures Are Gradually Being Reduced
Measurements were also taken in the days after the major fire. Based on the measurements of external authorities and BASF, the cities of Ludwigshafen and Mannheim gradually rolled back their safety instructions. As the Ministry of Environment and the city have confirmed, noticeable measured values of harmful substances were not encountered at any point in time, whether on the day of the accident or the past few days. Locally elevated measurements were only detected in the immediate vicinity of the accident site.

“We Take Your Concerns Seriously”

In an interview with BASF information, Margret Suckale, Site Manager and a Member of the Board of Executive Directors, spoke about the work of the Emergency Response Steering Committee (LAG).

Ms. Suckale, the Emergency Response Steering Committee met for up to 16 hours a day and also worked through the weekend. What is your impression of the crisis management at BASF?
Thanks to the tremendous dedication and expertise of our expert teams, and many colleagues at our site, we have achieved much in a very short time. A big ‘Thank you!’ to everyone who dedicated themselves to the challenges at hand and who continue to do so tirelessly. But our work is far from over. Now, we need to focus on helping the people affected by the accident, and we need to limit the damage so that the site is fully operational as soon as possible.

Government officials often visited the crisis team...
...and this was helpful as the responsible political leaders could get a firsthand impression of how we are dealing with the situation. Interior Minister Lewentz and Environment Minister Höfken were both here on Monday of last week. Minister President of Rhineland-Palatinate Malu Dreyer even interrupted her holidays to come here. Opposition leader Julia Klöckner was here, as was our Lord Mayor Eva Lohse. Municipal and state politicians support BASF in good, but also in difficult times.

How do you see the criticism of the company’s communication?
In contrast to external media, we can only publish established facts. The operations command of the professional fire department and the investigation conducted by the public prosecutor’s office means that sovereignty of information is not in our hands. The things that we were able to say, were communicated as quickly as possible. And we will continue to do so. We will also do everything we can to clarify what caused this tragic accident as soon as possible.

How do you respond to the wishes expressed by employees to be informed quicker and more comprehensively?
That primarily refers to the time immediately following the event, and I fully understand their demands. Very important to me is that the employees at the site were not in danger at any time. Nonetheless, we take their concerns seriously and we will improve our respective information processes. Information is one thing, but talking to our colleagues is very dear to me. We are all preoccupied by the tragic event. Speaking to one another helps heal the wounds.

Close Cooperation with the Authorities

BASF notified all relevant authorities immediately following the explosion. In accordance with the legal requirements, the BASF's fire department was in command of operations and the professional fire department of the City of Ludwigshafen formed a crisis team in the main fire station in Mundenheim. The professional fire departments of Ludwighafen and Mannheim and the site fire department were all involved in extinguishing the fire.

After the fire broke out, air measurements were made at the accident site as well as the vicinity of the site in Ludwigshafen and Mannheim. These measurements did not show any noticeable amounts of harmful substances, which the Ministry of Environment and the City of Ludwigshafen have confirmed. Locally elevated measurements were only detected near the accident site. The measured data from the Speyer, Worms and Frankenthal stations also displayed no abnormalities.
The City of Ludwigshafen initiated and led the press conferences held during the week of the accident. BASF works together with the structural and approval authority (SGD Süd) in Neustadt everyday. Representatives of SGD Süd are authorized to visit the site and inspect the plants at any time, even unannounced. On Monday, the SGD was represented both at the accident site and in the BASF Emergency Response Committee (LAG). The Rhineland-Palatinate Environment Minister, Ulrike Höfken, also attended in order to find out more. The Minister of the Interior, Roger Lewentz, visited the site and then spoke at a press conference. On Tuesday, Minister President of Rhineland-Palatinate Malu Dreyer visited the crisis team of the professional fire department. She also visited the command center of the BASF site fire department, together with the Chairman of the Board of Executive Directors, Dr. Kurt Bock and Member of the Board of Executive Directors, Margret Suckale.
After the explosion, the public prosecutor’s office closed off the area around the accident site up to Gate 15. This area can no longer be entered without their permission. When the fire was extinguished and there was no more danger, the public prosecutor's office and the police started their investigation. Their main focus is currently on preserving any evidence and gaining insight into the events. It is at the sole discretion of the public prosecutor’s office to decide when any investigation results will be announced. In the meantime, there is a lot of speculation, especially on social media. BASF will not participate in this activity.

“The area around the accident site in the North Harbor where the explosion took place may not be entered until further notice, not even by BASF employees. This is due to the investigation of the Frankenthal public prosecutor’s office to discover the cause of the accident. The public prosecutor’s office has extensively blocked off the area, and they will also decide when this area can be opened again.”

Dr. Wolfgang Haas, President ZR Legal, Taxes & Insurance

“The cooperation between the BASF site fire department and the Ludwigshafen professional fire department is effective and professional, as was always the case in the past. Both departments managed the operation together and discussed the next steps in detail.”

Peter Friedrich, head of the professional fire department, Ludwigshafen

“Employees at the site have come together.”

BASF information spoke to Sinischa Horvat, Chairman of the BASF SE Works Council, regarding his experiences and the Works Council's activities after the tragic accident.

Mr. Horvat, how do you perceive the current mood of the staff?
I feel that this tragic event has brought the employees at the site closer together. These days, many of us are pushing our personal limits. This is particularly true for the emergency personnel, but also for the colleagues from the various working groups and the Emergency Response Steering Committee (LAG). Our employees have questions that need answering.

What is your job as a member of the LAG?
I focus on the issue of care and support for the affected relatives and employees as well as on providing detailed information to the staff.

What kind of work does the Works Council do in a crisis situation such as this?
We have met several times since the events on Monday. We talk to the representatives to get a feel for the staff's concerns, and we are focusing on helping people come to terms with the tragedy. In the working groups, we discuss which lessons this teaches us for the future, in order to protect the staff even better.

“I was very moved by the tragic accident. My thoughts go out to the people affected by the accident to whom I wish to express my deeply felt sympathies. Such a tragic event with unclear circumstances, resulting in deaths and injuries surpasses the demands of everyday management. Although the media has a legitimate interest in providing information in a timely manner, the BASF crisis response team has consistently chosen to publish proven, factual information. It has become apparent that the spreading of images and news via digital media will be challenge for future crisis communication.”

Michael Vassiliadis,
Chairman of the Industriegewerkschaft Bergbau, Chemie, Energie (IG BCE, industrial mining, chemistry, energy union)

Even outside the site premises, people feel connected to BASF. Residents and local politicians have voiced their opinions and show their sympathy.

“The horrible accident last Monday hit many people in the city hard, including me personally. I would like to express my heartfelt sympathy. Due to the victims and the injured, we can't just go back to our everyday lives. We need to take the concerns of the residents seriously. They need to believe that BASF is doing everything possible to rebuild trust in Ludwigshafen. This includes open dialog with the urban community in the spirit of good and trusting collaboration.”

Dr. Eva Lohse,
Mayor of the City of Ludwigshafen

“As district mayor of the northern district of the city, it always affects me when something happens at BASF. It is a tragic accident for all of us as well as for BASF and its employees, and my thoughts go out to the deceased, the injured and their families. Sadly, when it comes to safety at BASF, we have seen an increase in accidents in the recent past. However, I still trust in the high safety standards of BASF and regard BASF as an excellent partner for myself as a mayor and for the local public."

Udo Scheuermann,
District Mayor of the northern districts Oppau, Edigheim and Pfingstweide and member of the municipal SPD faction

“Many thanks to the firefighters and emergency personnel for their efforts in fighting the fire. This includes the doctors in surrounding hospitals, who have been treating the injured since the accident. When talking to local residents, I have perceived a sense of disappointment along with insecurity. Although the processes and procedures are effective, now is the time to reach out to the people and address their shock and grief.”

Günther Henkel,
District Mayor of the district of Friesenheim and member of the municipal SPD faction

“We are grieving for those killed in the accident at BASF and have deep sympathy for their relatives. We hope that the injured will recover soon. At the moment, grief, sympathy and hope are the predominant feelings, but still BASF should take measures to regain the trust of the local public as quickly as possible. BASF's cautious and restrained information policy has caused some insecurity in the city. Unconditional transparency and unreserved clarification of the horrible events of October 17 are expected as soon as possible.”

Ernst Merkel,
CDU county chairman Ludwigshafen

“I was in Portugal and received the information on my iPhone. Then I did some research. For me, the criticism when it comes to safety was not appropriate since I know the control procedures of the authorities from my own experience. They put great effort into safety, and sometimes things happen despite having taken the best safety precautions. I imagine everything is being done to find the cause of the accident.”

Dr. Sebastian Kevekordes,
member of the community advisory panel

“The city and BASF have been collaborating closely for many years and have placed trust in each other. We live next to and from BASF. In light of the many incidents in 2016 and the tragic explosion on October 17, our fundamental trust has been deeply shaken. Many people feel insecure, which is why we expect that the cause of the accident will be cleared up, and the necessary consequences will be drawn. This is the only way to regain the trust that has been lost. The safety and health of the people must always come first.”

Dieter Feid,
Ordnungsdezernent (town councilor) of the City of Ludwigshafen, municipal SPD faction Ludwigshafen

“Together with everyone in the region, including those who lost their loved ones, we grieve for those killed in the explosion and wish the best to those who were injured. We are grateful for the brave efforts of the firefighters and the emergency personnel. It is now up to BASF and the authorities to clarify the circumstances and cause of the accident and make them wholly transparent. We expect increased safety efforts from BASF and more open communication with the staff, local residents and the general public that exceeds the legal obligation of what to report.”

Hans-Uwe Daumann,
Chairman of the municipal faction Ludwigshafen, Bündnis 90 Die Grünen

“BASF works management, the state government and the city authorities in Ludwigshafen and Frankenthal are now responsible for finding the cause of the accident and taking action for the future: Communication with the authorities and the press must be faster, more sincere and more comprehensive. We are all grieving for the victims along with the colleagues from BASF, but now it is also time to limit future risks.”

Dr. Liborio Ciccarello,
Chairman of the left-wing (Linke) faction Ludwigshafen

Photo: BASF

The explosion at the North Harbor is a major blow to the Ludwigshafen site.
The site workforce is mourning the lost lives and grieves for the many injured colleagues. Large parts of the site's production plants have been affected. This is due to the fact that the raw materials supply and the entire site's logistics were severely impaired for an indefinite period by the loss of the supply routes in the area of the explosion.

Many colleagues are working around the clock to manage the Verbund so that the maximum number of plants can be safely supplied and start production again. The first step was to bring the steam cracker back online. The Steam Cracker II has been producing ethylene again since Friday of last week. Steam Cracker I will also resume operations shortly. The petroleum (naphtha) required for operation of the steam cracker will now be delivered through the Mannheim oil port on the Friesenheimer Island and then supplied directly to the site via the culvert. The North Harbor will not be available for an extended period due to damages caused by the explosion. Safety measures are still in effect for the entire area around the accident site.

What does this mean for logistics at the site?
Some materials will have to be supplied by trucks and railway, which entails a tremendous amount of effort. Verbund means proceeding in a coordinated manner and taking the big picture into account. Colleagues already proved that they are up to this task during the 2008 financial crisis. Participants in a Verbund coordination group discuss the next steps and the priorities on a daily basis. In addition to the supply and distribution of material flows, the entire factory logistics has to be completely redesigned. Road and truck transport as well as rail and tank cars now play a more important role in the supply of materials. The main truck entrance, Gate 15, is currently not operable. Instead, Gate 12 has been blocked for passenger car traffic and is now available for truck entry only. It is no wonder that in recent days, colleagues have been working around the clock to handle and eliminate truck back-ups at the site. Moreover, intense efforts are underway to reopen the intermodel transport terminal. Internal handling and coordination is one issue. BASF customers expect reliable delivery. They will be immediately notified when delivery cannot be guaranteed and force majeure has been declared (see info box). Currently, 23 plants are still not in operation and 45 plants are not operating at full capacity (as of October 24). “As soon as the accident site has been released, we will do everything to make damaged pipes operational again as fast as possible. A team of employees is already preparing the repair work. Despite the required haste, safety is the highest priority,” says Dr. Jürgen Nahstoll (ESI), responsible for the site's infrastructure.

In the photo (from left to right): Giuseppe Russo (ESL/RT), Harbor/Tank Farm, Stefan Acker und Uwe Matheis (both GTG/MI), Materials Engineering, Jürgen Helt (GUS/F), Incident Commander at the harbor, and Ralf Pidde, Police Rhineland-Palatinate, discuss how to proceed with ultrasound measurements of a pipeline near the accident site. Photo:BASF

More than four weeks after the explosion, BASF technical and safety experts are continuing to work with the authorities on securing and draining the pipelines at the accident site at the North Harbor. The aim of this work is to support the public prosecutor in his investigations and to rebuild the infrastructure at the accident site. The site fire department is also heavily involved, even though returning to the site where they lost three colleagues is not easy.

“We are working flat out to secure the damage site, so that evidence can be gathered at the site safely,” said Siegfried Fiedler (GUS/FO), Head of Onsite Emergency Response Operations (TEL). Currently working at the South fire station on planning and coordinating the safety measures, TEL is made up of BASF experts from the Plant Safety, Engineering and Technical Plant Inspection units and representatives of the production plants and site fire department. In this role, TEL acts as a link with the Southern Structure and Licensing Directorate (Struktur- und Genehmigungsdirektion Süd), which is responsible for approval and with which all safety concepts created by BASF are closely coordinated.

As well as police representatives, around twenty other BASF experts from the Pipe Racks, Port & Tank Farm and BASF Fire Department units are working on site in the piping area to secure, drain and flush pipelines for liquid gas and liquids. Later on, the work will also include safe dismantling of the pipelines that run through the accident site and measures to rebuild the piping network and get the North Harbor up and running again.

According to Fiedler, the fact that all activities are being conducted by BASF experts has been agreed with the investigating authorities, and the work is running smoothly and with great accommodation on both sides.

Five men from the site fire department are on site at all times during the securing and draining work to support the specialist units and plants in matters relating to fire prevention and respiratory and body protection.

No easy task – especially for those whose colleagues were affected by the explosion. “Needless to say, it was up to every individual whether he wanted to work at the accident site,” said Rolf Haselhorst (GUS/F), Head of the BASF fire department. “Everybody deals with grief in different ways, and we have to be understanding of that. We are encouraging all colleagues to get the help they need – be it from BASF’s own psychological advisors or by talking to their comrades,” said Haselhorst.

Extra measurement technology is being used at the accident site to make his team’s work at the North Harbor easier.

“The condolences expressed by BASF also did us good,” said Haselhorst. “From the quick support from colleagues in the site fire departments in Antwerp, Münster and Schwarzheide to the personal thanks given by BASF employees at the memorial events – my team and I have been very touched.”

Photo:BASF

An employee event on the accident at the North Harbor was held at the Feierabendhaus on October 26. Chairman of the Board of Executive Directors Dr. Kurt Bock, Member of the Board of Executive Directors Margret Suckale, Site Director Dr. Uwe Liebelt (ES), Dr. Beate Ehle, Head of the Environment, Health & Safety division (GU), Head of the site fire department, Rolf Haselhorst (GUS/F), and other members of the Emergency Response Steering Committee (LAG) were there to talk to employees and answer their questions. Here, BASF information summarizes some of the questions and answers.

In the first few days after the accident, there was praise for the crisis team and all those who helped them, but criticism of the way the accident was communicated. Do you share this view?

Dr. Kurt Bock:
I understand some of the criticism of the communication. The first public press release was published extremely quickly, at the same time as internal communication was getting going. But of course, we still have to examine whether we could have communicated even more quickly and directly – especially with regard to social media. They report live and often start to speculate, while we are still investigating the situation and have to bear responsibility for only communicating things that are actually verifiable. That of course gives the impression that we react and communicate too slowly.

The fact that I addressed the employees first instead of immediately making a public statement has also been a subject of discussion. It would have been relatively easy to get up in front of the cameras and talk to the public, but I saw it as my role to first talk to those who were directly affected, such as the firefighters. Although it was extremely tragic, the accident also showed the great strength of the BASF and how keen and willing the employees are to tackle problems. There is always room for improvement – there is no question there. But the crisis team has done an extraordinary job over the last few weeks to get the plant back to normal, and their work continues. We are being proactive in championing their work. The way we have dealt with this accident and stood together is proof of BASF’s strength.

How is BASF supporting the victims and their families?

Margret Suckale:
We will help the families and provide them with tangible support; we have said that from the start. But coping with the grief and healing the psychological scars is much more difficult. We stand shoulder to shoulder with the families.

The Works Council has been an enormous support to us. The employee support working group has made an almost super-human effort. It is staffed by colleagues from the social counseling service, the critical incident psychological support, and trained members of the Works Council, who have an almost impossible task – to contact the families and tell them what happened.

Mr. Haselhorst and I also visited the families of the victims to talk to their relatives and try to answer their questions. I think we succeeded in creating the trust that BASF needs. Some moments are so tough that they are almost unbearable. What comforts me is that there is so much solidarity within the site fire department, which is helping these families – the relatives both of those who were killed and of those who were injured.

Sinischa Horvat:
At the memorial, we stood together with the relatives to remember the fallen comrades and express our sympathy. I think that was important for the families.

We have terrible days and hours behind us that will leave their mark on us forever. One difference that I think is already noticeable is that we have all become closer.

Caring for the victims and their families is of course also an important concern of the Works Council, and one that we included in the discussion very early on. But the staff as a whole is also enormously keen to help. We heard that from the firefighters at the memorial, too. Our job now is to continue to support them.

Why were we at the site not told how to behave? Information that there was no danger and that work could continue as normal would have been useful.

Dr. Beate Ehle:
Firstly, all we can do is apologize that this was not done. Thanks to our measurements, we were absolutely certain that the employees were safe. But what we failed to do that day was to communicate that actively and quickly. Perhaps we did not think enough about how worried you must have been. Our thoughts at that moment were initially with the employees who were fighting the fire outside. The top priority was the safety of the rescue workers and getting the fire under control. That was our most important task, and we put everything into it. In that situation, perhaps we did not make communication within the site as much of a priority as you would have liked.

Why did BASF provide so little information on the accident? And why did the information from the city and from BASF contradict one another? That caused a lot of concern among the employees.

Dr. Uwe Liebelt:
All we knew on October 17 was that there was a 100-meter wall of flames above the accident site, so nobody could get close to the pipelines. The pressure drop in the ethylene and propylene pipelines made it clear that they had also been affected. The other pipelines were partitioned off. Because there are no sensors inside the section that was partitioned off, there was no way for us to determine the state of those pipelines. We had to rely on the results of the air quality monitoring but, because many pressurized gases release very similar gases when burned, this was not conclusive either. Speculation is never helpful, and we might even have sparked panic. Our responsibility was to only provide information that we absolutely knew to be true. But back to the discrepancy between the way BASF assessed the situation and the way those outside did: We are scientists here. If our measurements do not show anything and the Head of the BASF fire department tells us that the acute situation is under control, we see no need to issue a warning to more than 30,000 people and trigger an alarm. The city has a different threshold, above which it tells people to keep their doors and windows closed. They issued their warning purely as a precaution. Then someone from your family calls and says, “We’re supposed to stay indoors, but you’re allowed to leave the building even though you’re much closer.” That led to some concerns – I understand that. We have already had a meeting with the city and decided that we need to create a shared catalog of the type of warnings we issue. We need to harmonize our approach.

Why did the fire department get so close to the fire?

Rolf Haselhorst:
When the alarm sounded, all we knew was that there was a fire at the harbor, and we could not see any more than that as we approached, either. My employees took three minutes to get there. When they did, they saw a fire between two pipelines.

The incident commander took the decision – absolutely correctly in my opinion – to use a water guns to secure the area and minimize the effect on the surrounding pipelines. This is standard procedure. The type of water guns we use is totally different from the ones used by the public fire department in terms of their power and long spraying distance. The technology we use is almost unique.

But after two and a half minutes, the incident commander was met with a wall of flames measuring 100 meters across. We kept back at a distance of 50 meters, which is more than usual for a deployment like this. That is why I am absolutely convinced that my firefighters and the incident manager – who was one of those killed – did everything right.

A large number of customers and business partners worldwide have contacted BASF to express their sympathies following the explosion on the October 17. As well as messages of condolences, many also spontaneously offered their help and support. This included international companies, which are normally in competition with BASF.

BASF information has selected a few to show:

Stabilizing the Verbund

Photo:BASF

Several weeks after the explosion on the North Harbor, the consequences on site are still noticeable. It will take months before the North Harbor is fully operational again. During that time, colleagues in production, logistics and marketing must find solutions outside the usual procedures.

Even when both steam crackers in Ludwigshafen operate again, it does not mean that they and the downstream plants will be able to operate as normal again. Various plants are still currently out of operation; several are functioning on partial load. Some materials, such as the partially missing propylene, cannot be replaced at the moment. This also has consequences on subsequent products, such as the acrylic acid value chain. The factory logistics must also be rescheduled, above all the delivery of raw materials as well as the loading and unloading. Nevertheless, the railway is fully available, and the location’s important intermodal transport terminal resumed operations on the October 31. The truck traffic is running again as normal between Gate 15 and Gate 11.

Many colleagues are currently working on developing concepts and temporary solutions so that the plants at the site are supplied reliably and the Verbund is stable. There is a lot to consider in doing so: Which plant most urgently needs raw materials? Which has reserves? How long can existing stocks last? Do the planned plant shutdowns fit into the concept? Which transport routes and transport auxiliaries are suitable for the raw material supply, which would normally go through the North Harbor? These are the kind of questions still being discussed by the regularly convening Verbund coordinating group. “We consider the entire site, starting with the supply chains to production stages all the way to the relationships between the operations. We discuss everything before making a decision. A lot of our experienced colleagues are helping us with this” says Dr. Ferdinand Lippert, Head of Basic Petrochemicals Europe (E-CPB) and spokesperson of the Verbund coordinating group.

The logistics team are particularly in demand. Around 40 percent of the total transport volume at the location is handled via inland vessels. On average, seven ships docked in the North Harbor a day – which is equivalent to around half the total ship cargo. That will have to be compensated. The Port of Ludwigshafen, the oil port on the Friesenheimer Insel and the tank farm are fully functional.

The bulk of the raw material supply to the site will now be transported by rail and using the port on the Friesenheimer Insel – a logistical challenge. For this, twice as many ships as before and many additional trains each week containing the most important raw materials such as naphtha, methanol, benzene and toluene must be emptied. After unloading on Friesenheimer Insel, the raw materials will be transported to Ludwigshafen via the pipelines under the Rhine through a culvert. On the Ludwigshafen side, it is already planned to put one of the open risers undamaged in the accident back into operation with certain products in the North Harbor in the coming months. However, raw materials and products that cannot currently be transported by ship are being preferentially transported by rail. This applies in particular to supplying the entire site with gases and other important raw materials. “Everything is precisely planned in terms of logistics and perfectly coordinated so that the remaining capacities will be fully utilized by ship, rail, intermodal transport and truck after the accident. Our goal is that our customers and the site are supplied as effectively as possible,” explains Dr. Andreas Backhaus, Head of internal logistics (ESL).

On the November 3, a large part of the North Harbor was released by the public prosecutor’s office. Securing work is ongoing, amongst other things the product-carrying piping close to the site of the accident will be emptied. “Where safety is concerned, even before the accident we were doing a good job. But we set ourselves the goal to keep improving back in spring and to become the model example in the BASF Group. The accident serves as an additional impetus to carry this out as quickly as possible. We owe this to the victims, their relatives and to ourselves”, affirmed Site Director Dr. Uwe Liebelt (ES).

Since 1987, human biomonitoring has been taking place at BASF. Experts from the Occupational Medicine and Safety department (GUA) are measuring hazardous substances, specifically their decomposition products, in the employee’s urine or blood in order to recognize and evaluate their impact.

This was exactly what happened after the disaster at the North Harbor. The results are now available. BASF information spoke with Prof. Dr. Michael Bader (GUA/BC), Head of the Human Biomonitoring Laboratory at BASF, About the purpose of human biomonitoring, the results after the accident and about how to evaluate these results.

How does human biomonitoring work at BASF?
In our company, human biomonitoring takes place within the scope of normal occupational medical prevention during plant shutdown or after missions of the rescue personnel when it is possible that employees have been exposed to hazardous substances. For many years now we have maintained a close cooperation with the site fire department. Since 2015, human biomonitoring has been available after each mission with potential exposure to products. Because if we know whether there was contamination and how much there was, we can draw conclusions about the effectiveness of the protective measures. What is important: The urine sample must be handed in immediately after a shift or after a mission because many of the hazardous substances in the body are quickly broken down and excreted. Human biomonitoring is always voluntary and is subject to medical confidentiality.

What happens if an employee has an increased level of dangerous substances in his or her body?
For every dangerous substance, we have a so-called action threshold. This is usually a derived, toxicological threshold defined by the Federal Ministry of Labor. It applies to the daily handling of hazardous substances in the workplace. If the measured concentration is above the action threshold, we try to identify together with the employee what the cause could be. For example, whether the protective measures in the workplace are adequate and implemented correctly.
We report our findings in a summarized and anonymous form to the companies so that, where necessary, improvements can be made.

But what does an “increased level” mean for the employee and his or her health?
The action thresholds are sufficiently low that even a single, visible increase is not an immediate cause for concern. It is a significantly greater health risk, however, when heightened exposure to the hazardous substances occurs daily over an extended period of time. To prevent this, occupational medicine is using human biomonitoring. In this way, contamination with hazardous substances is detected early on.

What did we find out from the samples gathered after the disaster in the North Harbor?
Up to now, we have examined around 100 urine samples for pyrene, benzene and toluene or specifically their decomposition products (see graphic). In the case of our firefighters, 6 of the 49 samples were over the action threshold for benzene. In the case of a further six firefighters and one person from “Group 2”, the level was above the half-way limit to the action threshold for benzene. The results for pyrene and toluene were in the normal range for all the people involved in the examination, with the only exception being a slight increase in the level of pyrene for one of the firefighters.

What do the results reveal?
We are currently working on a detailed analysis. What we can say at this present time is the following: Overall, the contamination with hazardous substances of the people at the site of the accident was slight. The action threshold is increased only for those few employees who were directly and for a long period of time at the source of the fire during the mission. The inconspicuous results for pyrene would appear to suggest that the exposure to soot particles by the emergency personnel was low. During human biomonitoring after fires with strong soot build up, significantly increased concentrations of pyrene are normally found. Ultimately, our data attests to the evidence of the environmental measures and the observations on site. This leads us to the conclusion that there was no increased health risk from hazardous substances for the employees on site and for the residents.

Source:BASF